|
|
|
The suggestion that the United States should work with Communist China to combat international terrorism is "a badly misguided proposal that merits a hasty burial." So warns Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC), senior Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and probably the best informed man on foreign policy in office today. The notion that the United States needs Chinese assistance is based on the false assumption that, since China is a member of the United Nations Security Council, we need China's acquiescence to adopt a resolution approving the use of force against whoever is responsible for the criminal attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Helms says, "Nothing could be more disastrous." Helms points out that the U.S. has been "down this UN road to disaster before." During Operation Desert Shield, we sought the approval of the UN to use force against Saddam Hussein, but the resolution adopted by the UN "tied the hands of U.S. forces and was one of the justifications used for stopping Operation Desert Storm with Saddam still in power." Helms advises us, "Now that the forces of international terrorism have struck New York and Washington, the U.S. cannot afford to waste time and energy consulting the United Nations." The second argument advanced by those who want us to cozy up to the Communist Chinese is the assumption that China and the U.S. share a common interest in fighting terrorism. Helms calls this "a naive and dangerous fantasy." He charges that "the Communist Chinese government is in bed with every one of the terrorist and terrorist supporting rogue regimes." Helms presented the evidence to back up his assertions. He says it is "absurd" to expect assistance against terrorism from the same Communist Chinese regime that has "supplied nuclear and missile technology to Pakistan and Iran, chemical weapons materials to Iran, missile technology to Libya, and air defense equipment to help Iraq shoot down U.S. pilots." Helms also says that the Chinese government is "one of the foremost benefactors of Afghanistan's ruling Taliban" and the largest foreign investor in Afghanistan. On September 11, Pakistan's Frontier Post reported that the Chinese government and the Taliban signed a new economic and technical cooperation agreement. China has two goals, Helms says, "both utterly incompatible with ours. Internally, the Chinese government is at war with all of Islam. Externally, China's ultimate goal is to destroy America's status as the sole superpower in the world." Continuing, Helms tells us that, "to the Chinese government, this is a zero sum game; anything that embarrasses, diminishes or bloodies the United States automatically serves China's interest." Summing it up, Helms warns: "Strategically and morally, the United States cannot and must not assume that China is part of a solution to terrorism. Indeed, Communist China is a very large part of the problem." |
|
|
|
Update on Military Threat
India's intelligence agencies claim that China has covertly supplied weapons to Taliban and their supporters in Pakistan, according to the New Delhi Pioneer. China Reform Monitor 409, Update on Human Rights
The Chinese state-run propaganda agency is selling books, films and video games glorifying the 9/11 strikes on the World Trade Center as a humbling blow against an arrogant U.S. Video disks filled with lurid images and dramatic music (even the theme from Jaws) are flooding Chinese markets. Scenes from the rubble of the twin towers carry the voice of a commentator stating, "This is the America the whole world has wanted to see." Beijing calls this an "educational file" to "meet market demand." Damien McElroy Electronic Telegraph, 4-11-01
Update on Free Trade
The U.S. Dept. of Labor reported that 34,000 jobs, and maybe twice that, many of them higher-wage jobs, moved from the U.S. to China in 2001, as a result of warming U.S.-China relations. According to researcher Stephanie Luce, Ph.D., "the results were surprising" because the figures are higher than job movement to Mexico in the same period. The companies that have moved their production to China still intend to serve a U.S. market: LaCrosse Footwear (winter boots), Lexmark (printers), Motorola (cell phones), Rubber-maid (cookware), Raleigh (bicycles), Cooper Tools (wrenches), Mattel Murray (Barbie doll play-houses), and Samsonite (luggage). Luce concluded: "Contrary to the high expectations that China's 1.2 billion population would provide an ever-expanding market for U.S. goods, by 2000 the value of goods imported to the U.S. from China exceeded the value of U.S. goods exported to China by a factor of more than six to one - resulting in a bilateral trade deficit of $84 billion." Luce on CNN
|

